Skip to content

The History of the Russian Revolution to Brest-Litovsk

Author: Leon Trotsky

Core Argument

This pamphlet, written by Trotsky during the Brest-Litovsk peace negotiations in early 1918, sets out to demonstrate that the Bolshevik seizure of power in November 1917 was not a conspiratorial coup d'état but the logical culmination of nine months of revolutionary agitation and propaganda that won the overwhelming majority of workers, soldiers, and peasants to the demand "All Power to the Soviets." Trotsky argues that the Bolsheviks succeeded because they advanced slogans—peace, bread, and land—that corresponded to the objective necessities of the masses, thereby transforming the people's actual experience into revolutionary consciousness. The transfer of power in October was relatively peaceful precisely because nine-tenths of the insurrectionary work had already been accomplished through agitation before the insurrection itself began.

The central thesis is that the Russian Revolution cannot be understood in isolation from the international class struggle. Trotsky insists that the final resolution of the war and of the revolution itself rests with the workers of Europe, not with diplomats or generals. The pamphlet is explicitly framed as a weapon in the international class war, written from the negotiating table of the old world for the coming revolution of the new. Trotsky draws a sharp contrast with the German Revolution of November 1918, where power fell into the hands of the working class but was betrayed by the Social Democratic leadership—presented as a negative proof of the Marxist theory of the subjective factor: without a revolutionary party and leadership, objective conditions alone cannot secure workers' power.

The preface engages in a sustained polemic against the Stalinist falsification of revolutionary history, quoting Stalin's own 1918 acknowledgment that Trotsky was "primarily and principally" responsible for organising the insurrection, then contrasting this with Stalin's later erasure of Trotsky's role. The pamphlet's republication on the centenary of 1917 is presented as a weapon in the ongoing struggle for world socialism, defending the historical record against systematic distortion and reasserting the indispensability of Lenin and Trotsky's leadership for the October Revolution's success.

Overview

The book opens with a preface that situates the pamphlet historically and politically. Trotsky establishes that this text was composed in fragments between diplomatic sessions at Brest-Litovsk, underscoring the peculiar position of revolutionaries compelled to parley with the most reactionary representatives of the old order. He does not present this as a contradiction to be regretted but as a strategic necessity from which revolutionary propaganda can be waged. The preface draws a sharp contrast with the German Revolution of 1918, where the Social Democrats, like the Mensheviks and SRs in Russia, hid behind the slogan of "democracy" while handing power to the bourgeoisie, with catastrophic consequences—the rise of Nazism, the Second World War, and fifty-five million deaths. The isolation of the Russian Revolution, compounded by this betrayal, led to the bureaucratic degeneration that produced Stalinism.

Part I traces the development of the November Revolution from its inception, arguing that the Bolshevik Party's conviction that the logic of events would place it in power rested upon the insignificance of the Russian middle-class democracy and the concentrated character of Russian industry, which endowed the proletariat with immense social weight. The war gave the army—the peasantry—the decisive role. Soldiers sent intellectuals and semi-intellectuals as their representatives to the Soviets, elevating lower middle-class democrats to enormous influence. These leaders, though calling themselves socialists, regarded the liberal bourgeoisie with ill-concealed respect, forming a bloc between Socialist Revolutionaries and Mensheviks that expressed a vassal attitude towards imperialist liberalism. The war became the touchstone: these intellectual leaders abandoned their internationalism once in responsible positions, pursuing the same path as the liberal bourgeoisie. The July offensive, demanded by the Allies, was opposed by the Bolsheviks, who warned that the army could not be sent into battle without new ideas. The July Days—a spontaneous armed demonstration by workers and soldiers—was suppressed, the Bolsheviks declared counter-revolutionary, and forged documents alleging they were German agents were published. After the Kornilov affair, the Bolsheviks won a decisive majority in the Petrograd Soviet, and similar shifts occurred in the Moscow Soviet and provincial Soviets.

Part II covers the Democratic Conference and the immediate preparations for insurrection. The Conference, convened by Tsereteli in late September, was an artificial body designed to give coalitionist parties a preponderance, but it ended in fiasco. The masses saw the coalitionist parties as bailiffs for the bourgeoisie. The Military Revolutionary Committee was formed as a Soviet staff counter to Kerensky's, appointing commissioners to all garrison sections and arms stores, effectively controlling arms distribution. On 6th November, the Committee began seizing administrative offices, placing guards at the Telephone Exchange, Telegraph Office, Post Office, and State Bank. During the night of 6th-7th November, key points in the city passed into Soviet hands without resistance. The Winter Palace was taken, Kerensky fled, and the other ministers were arrested. The Right Socialist Revolutionaries and Mensheviks walked out of the Congress of Soviets in protest, throwing "the whole responsibility" onto the Bolsheviks and Left Socialist Revolutionaries.

Part III describes the consolidation of power after the Petrograd victory. The new regime faced passive resistance from higher and middle officials, organised by the former Soviet parties. Military resistance in the capital ended after the suppression of the cadet rising. Kerensky fled to the front and, with General Krasnov, led Cossack echelons toward Petrograd, but after artillery bombardment between Krasnoye Selo and Tsarskoye Selo, the Cossacks fell back. Trotsky argues that only a resolute offensive secures victory; hesitation reflects the masses' lack of political self-confidence and the pressure of bourgeois opinion. The Constituent Assembly, fixed for late November, was doomed by delays and the fact that old party lists forced peasants to vote for lists headed by Kerensky's name. As Marxists, Trotsky argues, we never worshipped formal democracy: in a class-divided society, democratic institutions imperfectly express class struggle; in revolution, the direct struggle for power lets masses gain political experience faster than democracy's ponderous mechanism can keep pace.

Part IV covers the peace negotiations at Brest-Litovsk and the immense difficulties facing the Soviet regime. The Peace Decree was adopted at the Second All-Russian Congress of Soviets, and secret treaties were published and repudiated. Peace negotiations opened on 22nd December, with the Quadruple Alliance hypocritically adhering to democratic formulae of peace without annexations before laying bare their predatory demands. The Kiev Rada, under Austro-German dictation, declared Ukraine an independent republic and signed a separate peace. Facing a disintegrating army, the Russian delegation refused to sign the annexationist terms, and Germany launched a new offensive. Within the Bolshevik Party, Lenin argued for accepting a harsher treaty to gain a breathing space for internal consolidation. The Soviet regime faced economic exhaustion, administrative collapse, a demoralised peasantry, and civil war. Its only alternative to colonial subjugation was socialist transformation, based on a planned economy and labour discipline, sustained by the conviction that proletarian revolution in Europe and America would ultimately break the imperialist encirclement.

Chapter Guide

  1. Preface — Situates the pamphlet historically, defends the Bolshevik record against Stalinist falsification, and argues that without a revolutionary party, objective conditions alone cannot secure workers' power.
  2. Introduction — Declares the pamphlet a weapon in the international class war, written from the Brest-Litovsk negotiating table for the workers of Europe.
  3. Part I: The November Revolution — Traces how the Bolsheviks, through agitation corresponding to the masses' needs for peace, bread, and land, won the overwhelming majority before the insurrection.
  4. Part II — Covers the Democratic Conference fiasco, the formation of the Military Revolutionary Committee, and the seizure of power in Petrograd.
  5. Part III — Describes the consolidation of power, the defeat of Kerensky and Krasnov, and the doomed Constituent Assembly.
  6. Part IV — Covers the Brest-Litovsk negotiations, the Ukrainian question, and the immense difficulties facing the Soviet regime.

Key Concepts

  • Subjective factor — The necessity of a revolutionary party and leadership to transform objective conditions into revolutionary victory.
  • Soviets — Organic bodies based on factories and regiments, maintaining direct contact between deputy and electors, superior to formal democratic institutions in revolution.
  • Coalitionism — The policy of alliance between lower middle-class democrats and liberal bourgeoisie, leading to betrayal of revolutionary interests.
  • Brest-Litovsk — The peace negotiations where revolutionaries parleyed with imperialists, demonstrating the strategic necessity of the breathing space.
  • Constituent Assembly paradox — The contradiction whereby old party lists produced a majority for parties already rejected by the revolutionary masses.
  • Internationalism — The conviction that the Russian Revolution's fate depends on proletarian revolution in Europe and America.

Chapters

6 chapters