Skip to content

Class Struggles in France

Core Argument

The Class Struggles in France is Karl Marx's first sustained attempt to apply the materialist conception of history to contemporary political events, tracing the surface conflicts of the 1848-1850 French revolutions back to their economic and class foundations. The central thesis is that the revolution advanced precisely through its defeats: what was destroyed in the June Days and subsequent setbacks was not the revolution itself, but its pre-revolutionary baggage — the sentimental illusions, utopian conceptions, and half-formed social relationships that the revolutionary party carried over from the period before February 1848. Marx insists that revolutionary consciousness is not born spontaneously from triumph, but is hammered out in the crucible of struggle against a consolidated enemy.

The book sets out to prove that the revolution could not be freed from its encumbrances by victory, but only by a series of defeats that stripped away the "traditional appendages" and forced the creation of a powerful, united counter-revolution. This opponent, forged in combat, became the necessary anvil against which the party of overthrow could "ripen into a really revolutionary party." Marx argues that the real work of revolution is the sharpening of class conflict, not the immediate achievement of political power. The "tragicomic" achievements of February — the provisional government, the national workshops, the slogan of fraternité — were precisely the illusions that had to be shattered before a clear-eyed, class-based politics could emerge.

Engels' 1895 introduction provides a retrospective assessment of the work's theoretical significance and historical accuracy. He acknowledges that the revolutionary expectations of 1848 were historically premature, as capitalist development on the Continent remained insufficiently mature for a decisive proletarian victory. The fighting methods of 1848 — the barricade and surprise attack — had become obsolete; instead, the proletariat must proceed through gradual, tenacious struggle, using universal suffrage as an instrument of emancipation. The work first formulated the demand for society's expropriation of the means of production, distinguishing scientific socialism from utopian communism.

Overview

The book opens with Engels' 1895 introduction, which situates Marx's text within the evolution of proletarian strategy. Engels reflects on how history disproved the expectation of imminent revolution, noting that the Franco-German War and the Paris Commune of 1871 marked the beginning of the proletariat's most powerful rise, with the centre of the European labour movement shifting from France to Germany. The German workers provided a new weapon: the effective use of universal suffrage, previously dismissed as a governmental trick but transformed into an instrument of emancipation. Engels concludes with the striking irony that revolutionaries now thrive better through legal means than illegal ones, while the parties of order are destroyed by the very legality they established.

The opening chapter establishes Marx's dialectical reinterpretation of revolutionary defeat, arguing that the revolution advanced through its setbacks by forcing the creation of a powerful, united counter-revolution. This theoretical framework grounds the entire analysis, insisting that political events must be understood as expressions of underlying class antagonisms rather than as a simple chronicle of success or failure.

Part I traces the defeat of June 1848 from its origins in the July Monarchy, which Marx characterises as a joint-stock company for the exploitation of France's national wealth, ruled exclusively by the financial aristocracy. The February Revolution was not a revolution against the industrial bourgeoisie but against this narrow financial oligarchy, accelerated by the potato blight and crop failures of 1845-46 and the English commercial crisis of 1847. The Provisional Government was a fragile compromise, with the proletariat granted only two representatives and their social demands confined to the impotent Luxembourg Commission. The June insurrection — the first great battle between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat — was crushed with unprecedented brutality, compelling the proletariat to replace its limited demands with the slogan of the dictatorship of the working class.

Part II covers the period from June 1848 to June 1849, tracing the consolidation of bourgeois republican rule under Cavaignac, the election of Louis Napoleon as President on 10 December 1848, and the formation of the party of Order uniting Orléanists and Legitimists. The petty bourgeoisie, who had fought for property in June, were immediately ruined by the rejection of amicable debt settlements. The peasantry voted for Napoleon as a programme against taxes and the republic of the rich. The Montagne's attempt at a parliamentary insurrection on 13 June 1849 ended in a defeated caricature of the June Days, felling the petty bourgeoisie rather than the workers.

Part III analyses the consequences of 13 June 1849, characterising it as the classic insurrection of the democratic petty bourgeoisie, fundamentally distinct from the proletarian June Days. The party of Order's victory proved self-defeating: by restoring the hated wine tax and imposing repressive laws, it drove peasants, petty bourgeoisie, and middle classes into opposition. The March 1850 by-election, in which a coalition of the June insurgent Deflotte, the doctrinaire socialist Vidal, and the republican Carnot won in Paris, was itself a revolution, revoking June 1848, 13 June 1849, and the party of Order's majority. The proletariat increasingly rallied to revolutionary socialism, which declared the permanence of revolution and the class dictatorship of the proletariat as a necessary transition to abolishing all class distinctions.

Part IV concludes with the abolition of universal suffrage in May 1850, following the resurgence of industrial and commercial prosperity in 1849-50 that paralysed any further revolutionary upsurge. Marx argues that a genuine revolution is impossible during periods of general prosperity; it can only occur when productive forces and bourgeois forms of production come into fundamental opposition. The party of Order, composed of rival royalist factions, remained united only in defending the bourgeois republic against each other's restorationist ambitions and against Bonaparte. The only possible bourgeois solution was postponement through violation of the constitution and prolongation of presidential power, postponing the solution until economic relations produce a new explosion.

Chapter Guide

  1. Engels' Introduction to the 1895 Edition — Engels reflects on the evolution of proletarian strategy, acknowledging that the revolutionary expectations of 1848 were historically premature and that the effective use of universal suffrage had created an entirely new method of proletarian struggle.

  2. The Class Struggles in France: 1848-1850 — Marx establishes the dialectical reinterpretation that the revolution advanced through its defeats, stripping away pre-revolutionary illusions and forcing the creation of a consolidated counter-revolution.

  3. Part I: The Defeat of June 1848 — The July Monarchy's rule by the financial aristocracy is overthrown in February 1848, but the Provisional Government's compromises lead to the June insurrection, the first great battle between bourgeoisie and proletariat, crushed with unprecedented brutality.

  4. Part II: From June 1848 to 13 June 1849 — The bourgeois republicans seize control, the peasantry elects Louis Napoleon, and the party of Order forms, culminating in the Montagne's defeated parliamentary insurrection of 13 June 1849.

  5. Part III: Consequences of 13 June 1849 — The party of Order's victory proves self-defeating as repressive measures drive peasants and middle classes into opposition, while the proletariat rallies to revolutionary socialism declaring the permanence of revolution.

  6. Part IV: The Abolition of Universal Suffrage in 1850 — Industrial prosperity paralyses revolution, the party of Order abolishes universal suffrage, and the only bourgeois solution is postponement through violation of the constitution.

Key Concepts

  • Permanence of revolution — The revolutionary socialist doctrine, associated with Blanqui, declaring that the class dictatorship of the proletariat is a necessary transition to abolishing all class distinctions.

  • Party of Order — The coalition of Orléanist and Legitimist royalist factions that ruled jointly under the republic, united in defending bourgeois class rule against the proletariat.

  • Materialist conception of history — The method, first applied to contemporary events in this work, of tracing political conflicts back to their economic and class foundations.

  • Universal suffrage as instrument of emancipation — The transformation of the franchise from a governmental trick into a weapon for counting proletarian strength, agitating among the masses, and breaking repressive laws.

  • Social-Democratic party — The alliance of the petty-bourgeois Montagne with socialists, representing a coalition ranging from bourgeois liberalism to revolutionary terrorism.

  • Finance aristocracy — The bankers, railway magnates, mine owners, and allied landowners who ruled the July Monarchy as a joint-stock company for exploiting France's national wealth.

  • Lumpenproletariat — The déclassé elements recruited into the Mobile Guard to contain the workers, distinct from the industrial proletariat.

  • Barricade as obsolete tactic — Engels' argument that military transformation — conscription, mass armies, advanced weaponry, and cities laid out in wide streets — had made the old-style street fight materially and morally ineffective.

Chapters

6 chapters