Skip to content

Against the Stream: Charlie Kirk, French Revolt, Nepal Revolution

Against The Stream · 2025-09-11

Core Argument

The central thesis of this episode is that the world capitalist system has entered a phase of terminal crisis, manifested in simultaneous political explosions across multiple countries — France, Nepal, Indonesia — and in rising political violence in the United States. The argument is that these are not isolated events but expressions of a single underlying contradiction: the productive forces have outgrown the capitalist relations of production, and the system can no longer manage its own crises through debt, austerity, and repression. The episode claims that the ruling class has spent fifty years postponing the inevitable through ever-larger injections of fictitious capital, but that this strategy has now reached its limit. The only way forward, the hosts argue, is the revolutionary overthrow of capitalism and the establishment of working-class power — and the central political task is to build the organised revolutionary force capable of leading these spontaneous eruptions to victory.

Theoretical Grounding

The analysis is grounded in classical Marxist historical materialism, explicitly invoked at the opening: "It's not consciousness that determines existence, but social existence that determines consciousness." The hosts deploy Marx's theory of the contradiction between the forces and relations of production as the framework for understanding the current conjuncture. The discussion of French debt — from the post-war boom ending in 1974 to the present accumulation of sovereign debt at 114% of GDP — draws implicitly on the Marxist theory of overaccumulation and the tendency of the rate of profit to fall, though the episode does not use these terms explicitly. The analysis of debt as a means of "postponing the inevitable" by "smoothing over" crises while preparing deeper ones is consistent with the Marxist understanding of fictitious capital as a temporary displacement of crisis, not its resolution.

The episode's treatment of individual terrorism — in response to the Charlie Kirk assassination — draws on the classical Marxist tradition from Marx and Engels through Lenin and Trotsky. The argument that individual terror "creates two illusions: that we are dealing with individuals and not a whole system, and that we can do this work individually and not as a part of a class" is a direct continuation of the Bolshevik critique of Narodnik terrorism, with Lenin's brother Alexander Ulyanov cited as the historical reference point. The position is not moral but political: individual terror disarms the working class by substituting individual action for collective organisation.

The analysis of France, Nepal, and Indonesia applies the Leninist theory of the revolutionary situation — the objective crisis of the ruling class combined with the subjective readiness of the masses to act — while emphasising the absence of revolutionary leadership as the decisive weakness. The critique of the Nepalese "communist" parties (UML and Maoist Centre) for managing capitalism rather than overthrowing it is a standard Trotskyist analysis of Stalinism and centrism: parties that call themselves communist but defend capitalist property relations become the gravediggers of revolution, discrediting communist ideas among the youth.

Conjunctural Relevance

The episode is set in a specific conjuncture (September 2025) and references concrete events:

  • France: The fall of Prime Minister Bayrou, replaced by Sébastien Lecornu as the fifth prime minister in three years. The "block everything" protests on 10 September drew hundreds of thousands, with 700 workplace unions on strike, youth at the forefront, and brutal police repression. The hosts note that the CGT called a strike for 18 September — eight days later — which they interpret as an attempt to divert and control the spontaneous movement. French sovereign debt at 114% of GDP, deficit at 5.8%, last budget surplus in 1974.

  • Nepal: A youth-led movement against corruption and a social media ban escalated after police killed 19 protesters (including 14-year-olds) with live ammunition. Within two days, the government of KP Oli fell, protesters burned the parliament, judiciary, and airport, and the army appealed for calm. The hosts note that 20% of Nepal's working-age population has emigrated for work, remittances are 25-30% of GDP, and 800,000 people emigrated in 2024 alone — double the previous year.

  • United States: The assassination of Charlie Kirk by a sniper at Utah Valley University is situated within a pattern of political violence including the UnitedHealthcare CEO killing, attacks on Israeli embassy staff, and the attempted assassination of Donald Trump.

  • Geopolitics: Israel's bombing of a building in Qatar where Hamas negotiators were to meet, described as an open humiliation of Trump; Russian drone incursions into Poland; the ongoing genocide in Gaza; and the general crisis of European imperialism (Britain, France, Germany, Italy all in political crisis).

The episode connects these events to the long-term structural crisis of capitalism: 30 years of neoliberal austerity, the exhaustion of debt as a crisis-management tool, and the impossibility of further concessions to the working class.

Where the Argument Continues

The episode deliberately leaves open several questions:

  1. What happens next in Nepal? The hosts warn that without revolutionary leadership, the movement risks being stolen by a new coalition of the same parties — as happened in Bangladesh after the fall of Hasina. The argument continues in the RCI's analysis of the Bangladesh revolution and in the broader Marxist literature on Thermidorian reaction.

  2. What happens next in France? The tension between the spontaneous 10 September movement and the trade union leadership's attempt to channel it into the 18 September strike day is unresolved. The RCI's French section's editorial is referenced as the place where this analysis is developed further.

  3. The question of revolutionary leadership generally. The episode repeatedly emphasises that spontaneous movements, however powerful, cannot complete a revolution without a conscious revolutionary party. This is the central theme of the RCI's entire project and is developed across the Against the Stream and Spectre of Communism series.

  4. The Indonesia revolution from the previous week is referenced but not analysed in depth, with a promise to return to it.

Relevant episodes to consult: the previous week's episode on Indonesia; the RCI's analysis of Bangladesh; the Spectre of Communism series on the theory of revolution and the question of the party.

Connections

  • Classical Marxist texts: Marx's Preface to a Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy (the base-superstructure passage quoted at the opening); Lenin's What Is To Be Done? (the question of revolutionary organisation and spontaneity); Trotsky's History of the Russian Revolution (the laws of revolution, the role of the masses, the question of dual power).

  • On individual terror: Lenin's What Is To Be Done? (the critique of economism and terrorism as twin deviations); Trotsky's Terrorism and Communism (the distinction between revolutionary terror and individual terror).

  • On the crisis of the system: The RCI's own theoretical journal Spectre of Communism for the analysis of the long-term crisis of capitalism; the writings of the Revolutionary Communist Tendency on the tendency of the rate of profit to fall and the role of fictitious capital.

  • On Nepal: The RCI's articles from 2006-2008 warning that the overthrow of the monarchy without expropriation of the capitalist class would lead to a new form of class rule.

  • On France: The editorial of the French section of the RCI on the 10 September movement; the analysis of the pension struggle of 2022-2023 as a precursor.

Key Quotes

  1. "We are opposed to individual terrorism, the assassination of individuals who are either prominent right wingers or prominent state officials of repressive regimes. Not for moral reasons, not for abstract moral reasons... but from a political point of view. We think that this is a rotten system. The capitalist system is a rotten, violent, oppressive system that needs to be done away with. But the only way that this can be carried out is by the collective action of the working class."

  2. "Individual terrorism creates two illusions. One: that we are dealing with individuals and not a whole system that needs to be changed, and 2: that we can do this work individually and not as a part of a class, as a social force."

  3. "The last time France had a budget surplus was in 1974. What does that signify for us? The system began to go into decline. Like all social systems... the system hit a limit, and the rate of development started declining. Since then, the bourgeois have had to deal with deeper and deeper crises. And what has become one of the main ways for them to overcome these crises has been the taking up of debt."

  4. "The point is to say we can't stop there. How do you actually secure democracy? How do you actually secure a society that's run in the interest of the majority? Well, surely the majority must have the power to do so. And first of all, you do that by taking state power, by taking economic power away from the tiny group of parasites that exercise it."

  5. "We are not calling for revolution because it's not up to us. Revolutions will come because this system is at a dead end. But what we do is that we prepare ourselves. We prepare a force that's big enough and strong enough and conscious enough, with enough foresight and insight to be able to intervene and lead these movements to the victory."