Skip to content

Defence of Imperialism Cloaked with Deceptive Phrases

Marxist Theory · 2026-05-13

Core Argument

Lenin's central thesis is that the Executive Committee of the Petrograd Soviet's proclamation to the world's socialists constitutes a defence of Russian imperialism disguised in anti-imperialist language. The critical phrase — that the Provisional Government has "adopted" a platform of peace without annexations — is not a statement of fact but a political deception. Lenin argues that all capitalist governments, including Russia's, have renounced annexations in words while continuing them in deeds. By failing to name the specific annexations of Russia, Germany and Britain, and by treating the Provisional Government's verbal commitments as genuine, the proclamation does not advance the cause of peace but instead whitewashes one imperialist government while blackening others. The result is that the Executive Committee becomes, in effect, a defender of imperialism.

Theoretical Grounding

The article is a direct application of the Marxist method of unmasking the gap between bourgeois political forms and their class content. Lenin draws on the fundamental Marxist distinction between appearance and essence: the Provisional Government's diplomatic language is an appearance; the reality is the continued forcible holding of territories by all belligerent capitalist states. The argument sits firmly within Lenin's theory of imperialism as developed in Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism (1916) and his wartime writings on the collapse of the Second International. The key theoretical move is the refusal to treat any capitalist government — including Russia's post-February Revolution Provisional Government — as qualitatively different from others in its imperialist character. This is a polemic against what Lenin elsewhere calls "social-chauvinism" and "Kautskyism": the idea that a "good" imperialism or a "peace-loving" capitalist state exists. The article also exemplifies Lenin's insistence that the proletariat must tell the "bitter truth" about its own ruling class, a position rooted in the Marxist theory of the state as an instrument of class rule.

Conjunctural Relevance

The article was published in Pravda on 16 May (3 May old style) 1917, weeks after Lenin's return to Russia in the sealed train. The conjuncture is defined by dual power: the Provisional Government, dominated by liberal capitalists and moderate socialists, and the Soviets, in which the Mensheviks and Socialist Revolutionaries held the majority. The Executive Committee's proclamation was an attempt to position the Russian Revolution as a force for peace while maintaining support for the Provisional Government. Lenin's intervention is a frontal assault on this strategy. He names the specific annexations: Germany holds Belgium, part of France, Serbia, Montenegro, Rumania, Poland, Danish provinces, Alsace; Russia holds part of Galicia, Turkish Armenia, Finland, Ukraine; Britain holds India, Ireland, Turkish Mesopotamia, German colonies in Africa. By demanding a full list of annexations from all three powers, Lenin exposes the hypocrisy of singling out German aggression while excusing Russian and British imperialism. The article is thus a concrete intervention in the struggle for the political line of the Bolshevik Party and the international left in the midst of world war and revolution.

Where the Argument Continues

This article is a fragment of a much larger polemic. Lenin develops the same themes at greater length in The Tasks of the Proletariat in Our Revolution (April 1917) and in his Letters on Tactics. The argument against "revolutionary defencism" — the position that the Russian Revolution justified continued support for the war — is a central thread of Lenin's writings from April to October 1917. On IDOM, the theoretical tradition represented here is continued in articles on the nature of imperialist war, the critique of "lesser evilism" in contemporary conflicts (e.g., Ukraine, Syria), and the analysis of how reformist parties serve as transmission belts for bourgeois policy. The broader corpus includes Against the Stream episodes analysing the Ukraine war, where the same method of refusing to choose between imperialist camps is applied to the present conjuncture.

Connections

  • Lenin, Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism (1916) — the theoretical foundation for the analysis of annexations and the character of all belligerent states.
  • Lenin, The State and Revolution (1917) — written concurrently, developing the theory of the state that underpins the refusal to trust any capitalist government.
  • Lenin, Socialism and War (1915) — co-written with Zinoviev, establishing the position that the Second International's collapse into social-chauvinism was not an accident but a product of the imperialist epoch.
  • Rosa Luxemburg, The Crisis of Social Democracy (1916) — a parallel critique of the betrayal of internationalism by the SPD.
  • IDOM articles on the Ukraine war — contemporary applications of the same method: refusing to support either NATO or Russian imperialism, demanding a full list of annexations and imperialist interests on all sides.

Key Quotes

  1. "The gist of the matter is summed up in this one phrase. This phrase is a defence of Russian imperialism, which it cloaks and whitewashes."

  2. "Our Provisional Government has 'diplomatically' renounced annexations, just as the government of the German capitalists, those brigands Wilhelm and Bethmann-Hollweg, have done. In words, both governments have renounced annexations. In practice, both continue the policy of annexations."

  3. "First of all, the proclamation does not differentiate between the renunciation of annexations in words (in this sense, all capitalist governments, without exception, have 'adopted' the 'platform of peace without annexations') and renunciation of annexations in deeds (in this sense, not one capitalist government in the world has renounced annexations)."

  4. "To cloak an unpleasant truth with a deceptive phrase is most harmful and most dangerous to the cause of the proletariat, to the cause of the toiling masses. The truth, however bitter, must be faced squarely."

  5. "By refusing to do this, by whitewashing one's own government and blackening others, one becomes in effect a defender of imperialism."

  6. "What good do we do the cause of the working classes by uttering sugar-coated lies, by playing down the fact that the Plekhanovs and the Scheidemanns have gone over to the side of their respective capitalists?"