Skip to content

The Great Depression

Marxist Analysis · 2026-05-13

Core Argument

The central thesis is that the 2008–2009 global economic crisis is not a financial accident, regulatory failure, or once-in-a-century black swan event, but a structural crisis of capitalism itself — the inevitable consequence of the system's internal contradictions. Roberts argues that the massive expansion of fictitious capital (credit, property, stock market valuations) detached from real production values created the conditions for a slump that is the deepest since the 1930s. The crisis cannot be resolved by Keynesian state intervention, bank bailouts, or nationalist protectionism; it can only reach a bottom through the destruction of real capital values — factory closures, mass unemployment, wage cuts, and bankruptcies — which are the mechanisms by which capitalism restores profitability. The working class, not the investors or bankers, will bear the cost.

Theoretical Grounding

The analysis is grounded in Marx's law of the tendency of the rate of profit to fall, though Roberts deploys it implicitly rather than as a formal proof. The key distinction drawn is between fictitious capital (financial assets, property prices, credit instruments) and real capital (means of production, labour power, actual commodity values). The crisis is presented as the violent reassertion of the real economy over the speculative superstructure — a classic Marxist understanding of the relationship between the financial and productive spheres.

Roberts also draws on Marx's categories of constant capital (machinery, factories, raw materials) and variable capital (labour power) to explain the only path out of the slump: capitalists must reduce both to restore profitability. This is a direct application of Marx's theory of crisis as a mechanism for the devaluation of capital. The article also implicitly rejects underconsumptionist explanations — the problem is not that workers cannot buy what is produced, but that profitability has collapsed.

The piece sits firmly in the Marxist tradition that sees crises as endogenous to capitalism, not as external shocks or policy errors. It is explicitly opposed to Keynesian and social-democratic interpretations that treat state intervention as a permanent solution, and to neoclassical claims that crises are unpredictable anomalies.

Conjunctural Relevance

The article was written in February 2009, at the deepest point of the Great Recession. Roberts provides specific data: global unemployment projected at 220 million; China's official GDP growth slowing to 5% from 11%; Japan's economy shrinking by its largest amount in 27 years; Eastern European economies contracting by up to 10%; the US economy falling at 5% annually; UK house prices heading for a 40% cumulative fall. He names the Madoff Ponzi scheme ($50bn) and the Stanford fraud ($8bn) as emblematic of the criminality that surfaces when the bubble bursts.

Politically, the article targets Gordon Brown's New Labour government for its hypocrisy — having championed deregulation, privatisation, and the "end of boom and bust," Brown suddenly embraced Keynesian bailouts, bank nationalisation, and calls for controlling executive bonuses. Roberts also notes the turn toward protectionism (Obama's "Buy America," Brown's "British jobs for British workers") as a dangerous trend that will deepen the slump rather than resolve it.

The article's relevance to the current conjuncture is twofold. First, it provides a Marxist framework for understanding the 2008 crisis that remains essential for analysing the post-2008 period of low growth, stagnant wages, and repeated financial instability. Second, the patterns Roberts identifies — the gap between fictitious and real capital, the use of state funds to socialise capitalist losses, the turn to nationalism and protectionism — have recurred and intensified in the years since, including during the COVID-19 pandemic and the cost-of-living crisis.

Where the Argument Continues

The article leaves several threads underdeveloped. The relationship between the tendency of the rate of profit to fall and the specific form of the 2008 crisis is asserted rather than demonstrated with data — Roberts does not provide profit rate figures or a detailed empirical case. The argument about protectionism is flagged as "another story that we will return on another occasion," indicating a planned continuation.

The argument continues in several other IDOM articles from the same period and later. The December 2008 editorial "The crisis of world capitalism is gathering speed" and the November 2008 manifesto "The Crisis: Make the bosses pay!" provide the political conclusions — that the crisis requires a revolutionary working-class response, not a return to regulated capitalism. Roberts's later work, particularly his books The Great Recession (2009) and The Long Depression (2016), develops the empirical case for the law of the tendency of the rate of profit to fall as the underlying cause of the 2008 crisis and the subsequent period of stagnation.

Connections

This article should be read alongside:

  • Marx, Capital Volume 3, Part 3 — the theoretical foundation for the law of the tendency of the rate of profit to fall and the theory of crisis.
  • Michael Roberts, The Great Recession (2009) — the book-length development of the argument sketched here, with empirical data on profit rates.
  • Michael Roberts, The Long Depression (2016) — extends the analysis to argue that the post-2008 period is not a recovery but a prolonged depression.
  • Andrew Kliman, The Failure of Capitalist Production (2012) — a rigorous empirical defence of the law of the tendency of the rate of profit to fall as the cause of the 2008 crisis.
  • David Harvey, The Enigma of Capital (2010) — a different Marxist approach emphasising overaccumulation and spatial fixes, useful as a contrast.
  • IDOM, "The Crisis: Make the bosses pay!" (2008) — the political programme that follows from the economic analysis.

Key Quotes

  1. "Capitalism can only reach a bottom if it also destroys the value of real capital too. In order to restore profitability for capitalist industry, workers must be sacked and wages cut to lower the cost of what Marx called 'variable capital' and the factories must be closed and businesses put into bankruptcy in order to reduce the cost of what Marx called 'constant capital'."

  2. "There were a few voices even among capitalist strategists, apart from Marxists, who forecast the calamity that was coming from the massive expansion of 'fictititious' capital in form of cheap credit, rocketing property prices, ever-expanding stock market prices that were not matched by any equivalent expansion of real production values."

  3. "Gordon Brown used to argue that British capitalism, with the right policies adopted from America, could be made to expand 'endogenously' without slumps or 'cycles'. That was the theme of his main economic advisor, Ed Balls, now in the government. Now Mr Balls tells us we are in the worst economic slump for 100 years!"

  4. "The bankers did not see the credit crunch coming because their 'risk models' only went back ten years and did not take into account that capitalism has had slumps before that! Indeed, the banks' risk models said that the chance of what has now happened was once in 13.5 billion years."

  5. "Down the road, working people will not only have to pay for this capitalist mess through job losses, wage cuts and home foreclosures, but also through sharply increased taxes to pay for helping the bankers."

  6. "Neither free trade nor protectionism will save living standards under capitalism."