Skip to content

Analytical Summary: "Is China Communist?" — Spectre of Communism Podcast

Spectre Of Communism · 2023-11-21

Core Argument

The central thesis is that China is neither communist nor building towards communism, but is instead a capitalist society ruled by a bureaucratic state apparatus that represses the working class in the interests of capital accumulation. The claim rests on a distinction between the historical achievements of the 1949 Chinese Revolution — which the speaker affirms as genuinely progressive — and the subsequent degeneration of that revolution into a form of state capitalism. The argument proceeds by establishing what communism actually means in Marxist terms (classless society, withering away of the state, production for need rather than profit) and then demonstrating that China exhibits the opposite: extreme inequality, a powerful and growing repressive state apparatus, a billionaire class integrated into the party leadership, and an economy driven by capitalist crisis tendencies. The episode further argues that China is not an anti-imperialist force but a rival imperialist power, citing the Belt and Road Initiative, debt-trap diplomacy in Sri Lanka and Laos, and hard-nosed commercial lending practices as evidence of classical imperialist behaviour in Lenin's sense.

Theoretical Grounding

The analysis draws on several distinct Marxist traditions, primarily the Trotskyist current represented by the International Marxist Tendency (IMT). The key theoretical moves are:

  • The distinction between the revolutionary seizure of power and the subsequent degeneration of the revolution: The Chinese Revolution is presented as a genuine anti-imperialist and anti-feudal revolution that achieved real material gains, but whose form — a peasant-based guerrilla war led by a military command structure rather than an urban proletarian insurrection — produced a state apparatus independent of working-class control. This is a classic Trotskyist analysis of "deformed workers' states" or state capitalism, depending on the specific tradition.

  • Lenin's theory of imperialism as a stage of capitalism: The argument that China is imperialist does not rest on its foreign policy intentions but on the structural logic of monopoly and finance capital having outgrown the home market and needing to export capital. The Belt and Road Initiative is analysed not as development aid but as capital export in the Leninist sense.

  • The Marxist definition of communism as a classless, stateless society: The episode is careful to ground its critique in first principles — Marx's "from each according to ability, to each according to need" — and uses this as a benchmark against which to measure contemporary China.

  • Lenin's four conditions for a workers' state (right of recall, rotation of administrative tasks, no official paid more than a skilled worker, universal participation in management): These are deployed as concrete criteria that China manifestly fails to meet.

The analysis sits within the Trotskyist tradition's critique of Stalinism and its successors, but with a specific focus on China rather than the USSR. It does not engage with Maoism as a theoretical tradition, instead treating Mao's theoretical contributions as minimal and his strategic innovations as accidental rather than principled.

Conjunctural Relevance

The episode connects its theoretical argument to several concrete features of the current conjuncture:

  • Economic crisis tendencies in China: The speaker identifies a looming crisis of fictitious capital, with unsustainable debt levels, a housing market bubble, and slowing growth. The state's interventions are compared to post-2008 Western bailouts — nationalising losses while privatising profits. Youth unemployment is cited as having exceeded 20% before the government stopped publishing figures.

  • Geopolitical rivalry with the United States: The defining feature of the current world situation is identified as the clash between American and Chinese imperialism. This is not presented as a conflict between a progressive and a reactionary power, but as interimperialist rivalry.

  • Working-class militancy and state repression: The 2018 JC Technology strike and the subsequent police raids on workers and student Marxists are presented as emblematic of the regime's function: repressing working-class organisation on behalf of capital. The 2022 lockdown protests are cited as evidence of latent mass discontent.

  • The end of the "boom" phase: The episode argues that the era of high growth and globalisation that sustained Chinese state capitalism for three decades is over, and that the regime's legitimacy — which rested on delivering material improvements — is now eroding.

Where the Argument Continues

This episode is an introductory treatment that deliberately leaves several threads open for further development:

  • The Chinese Revolution and its aftermath: The speaker explicitly states that this will be returned to in future episodes. The analysis of the revolution's degeneration — the transition from a progressive anti-imperialist revolution to a state capitalist regime — is gestured at but not fully developed.

  • The nature of the Chinese state: The characterisation of China as a "state capitalist" society (as opposed to a "deformed workers' state") is asserted rather than argued in detail. This is a significant theoretical distinction within the Trotskyist tradition, and the episode does not fully locate itself within that debate.

  • The Chinese working class as a revolutionary subject: The potential for working-class revolution in China is stated but not theorised. The speaker notes that the working class "knows its own strength" and that "when the giant moves it will shake the earth," but the strategic questions — how to build revolutionary organisation under a repressive regime, the relationship between economic struggles and political consciousness — are left open.

  • The crisis of fictitious capital: The analysis of China's debt bubble and the tendency toward crisis is sketched but not developed in depth. This connects to broader Marxist debates about overaccumulation and the tendency of the rate of profit to fall.

For further development, listeners should consult: - Other Against the Stream and Spectre of Communism episodes on the Chinese Revolution and the nature of the Chinese state - IMT theoretical publications, particularly In Defence of Marxism issue 43 (mentioned in the episode) - Trotsky's The Revolution Betrayed (for the theoretical framework on degenerated workers' states) - Lenin's Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism (for the theory of imperialism deployed here)

Connections

  • Trotsky, The Revolution Betrayed: The theoretical template for analysing a revolution that has been bureaucratically deformed. The episode's distinction between the progressive content of the 1949 revolution and its subsequent degeneration mirrors Trotsky's analysis of the USSR.

  • Lenin, State and Revolution: The source of the four conditions for a workers' state that the episode uses as criteria. Also the source of the definition of communism as the withering away of the state.

  • Lenin, Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism: The theoretical basis for the claim that China is imperialist. The episode applies Lenin's criteria — capital export, monopoly, interimperialist rivalry — to contemporary China.

  • Cliff, State Capitalism in Russia: Tony Cliff's analysis of the USSR as state capitalist is the closest theoretical analogue to the episode's treatment of China, though the episode does not explicitly reference this tradition.

  • Other Against the Stream episodes on interimperialist rivalry and the crisis of global capitalism: These would provide the broader geopolitical and economic context for the analysis presented here.

Key Quotes

  1. "Marx understood communism to mean the state at which the classes have disappeared and the state has withered away... if China were a communist society now then what you would have is no state apparatus, you wouldn't have rich and poor, the working week would be greatly reduced."

  2. "The Chinese Communist party and the regime that they established was always a — there was never any workers' democracy within it, it was always bureaucratically controlled from above."

  3. "What China is doing is developing Chinese imperialism... Lenin describes imperialism not as a policy but as an outcome of the development of monopoly and finance capital and the fact that capital has outgrown the home market and needs to export itself."

  4. "The state apparatus is in the hands of the rich. They are themselves billionaires. They have no capacity to control these billionaires on behalf of the workers because they are themselves part of that class."

  5. "The future for China is not going to be like the past. You've had 30 or so years of unprecedented stability based upon a booming economy, and that has come to an end. The era of globalisation that that was based upon has also come to an end."