Skip to content

What is Trumpism with Alan Woods AGAINST THE STREAM

Against The Stream · 2025-03-20

Here is the structured analytical summary of the Against the Stream podcast episode, "What is Trumpism with Alan Woods."

Core Argument

The central thesis is that Donald Trump is not a fascist, a Bonapartist, or an anomaly, but rather a symptom of a deep structural crisis of global capitalism. The argument claims that the liberal establishment’s hysterical framing of Trump as a unique threat to democracy is a smokescreen for its own authoritarianism and its failure to address the material decline of the working class. Trump’s rise is explained as a right-wing expression of a genuine, seething mass anger against a corrupt political elite—an anger that the organised left, through its cowardice and reformism (exemplified by Corbyn, Syriza, and Podemos), failed to capture. The episode further argues that Trump’s foreign policy, particularly his desire to end the Ukraine war and negotiate with Russia, is not a betrayal of democracy but a rational, if reactionary, recognition of a lost war and a necessary geopolitical retreat to focus on China. The core claim is that the left must not fall into the trap of defending liberal institutions against Trump, but must instead offer an independent, revolutionary communist alternative to both the old establishment and the new right-wing demagogues.

Theoretical Grounding

The analysis is firmly rooted in the classical Marxist tradition, specifically the Trotskyist current represented by the Revolutionary Communist International. It draws on several key concepts:

  • The Crisis of Capitalism and the Tendency of the Rate of Profit to Fall (TRPF): The episode grounds Trumpism in the objective limits of globalisation. It argues that the post-Soviet era of globalised trade, which served to counteract the falling rate of profit by expanding the market, has reached its limits and is now turning into its opposite: economic nationalism, tariffs, and inter-imperialist rivalry. Trump is the political embodiment of this turn.
  • The Marxist Theory of Fascism: The episode explicitly rejects the lazy application of the term "fascist" to Trump. It invokes the classical Marxist definition of fascism as a mass movement of the petty bourgeoisie and lumpenproletariat, used as a battering ram to smash the organised working class and its institutions. Trump, by contrast, is presented as a free-market populist who has not attacked trade unions or socialist parties, and who advocates for a weak state, not a totalitarian one.
  • Class Polarisation and the Collapse of the Centre: The analysis uses the concept of political instability as a reflection of class polarisation. It argues that the "centre ground" has collapsed, creating a vacuum that is being filled by both right-wing demagogues (Trump, Farage) and, potentially, a revived left. The failure of reformist left parties to break with the establishment is identified as the key factor that has prepared the ground for the rightward shift.
  • Imperialism and Inter-Imperialist Rivalry: The Ukraine war is analysed not as a moral crusade for democracy, but as a proxy war engineered by the US (under Biden) to weaken Russia. Trump’s policy is seen as a shift in US imperial strategy: a retreat from Europe to concentrate forces against the primary rival, China. This is a classic Leninist analysis of interimperialist contradictions.

Conjunctural Relevance

The episode is highly specific to the conjuncture of March 2025, using concrete events to illustrate its theoretical points:

  • The Ukraine War: The analysis is anchored in the recent Trump-Putin phone call and the limited ceasefire agreement. The episode argues that Russia has decisively won the war, citing the catastrophic failure of the Ukrainian incursion into the Kursk region, the depletion of Western arsenals, and the collapse of Ukrainian morale (referencing the "busification" of conscripts). It frames the European push for rearmament (Germany’s €500bn defence fund, the UK’s cuts to welfare to fund military spending) as a desperate, irrational, and dangerous attempt to prolong a lost war.
  • The Economic Crisis: The episode connects the geopolitical shift to domestic economic pressures. It notes the UK’s rising debt servicing costs (£9bn in December alone) and the cuts to benefits for the disabled, arguing that the ruling class is making the working class pay for a war that serves only the interests of the oligarchs. The potential for a US economic crisis by the end of 2025 is raised as a likely trigger for future instability.
  • The Rise of Right-Wing Populism: The episode uses the example of the Romanian election annulment and the arrest of Georgescu to argue that the "liberal" establishment is the true threat to democratic rights. It positions Trump, Farage, and Reform UK as symptoms of a global anti-establishment mood that the left has failed to harness.

Where the Argument Continues

This episode is a current affairs intervention, not a theoretical treatise. It deliberately leaves open several threads that are developed elsewhere in the RCI corpus:

  • The detailed Marxist analysis of Trumpism itself: The episode is a trailer for Alan Woods’ article, "The Meaning of Donald Trump: A Marxist Analysis," which will be published on marxist.com. The podcast explicitly directs listeners there for the full theoretical treatment.
  • The nature of the "left" and its failure: The critique of Corbyn, Syriza, and Podemos is a recurring theme in Against the Stream and The Spectre of Communism. The argument that reformism inevitably leads to capitulation is a settled position of the tradition, but the specific analysis of how this failure creates the space for the right is developed in episodes on the Greek crisis and the fate of the Labour Party under Starmer.
  • The future of the Trump movement: The episode speculates that "Trumpism without Trump" is impossible and that the movement will eventually fragment, with honest workers moving left and fascist elements coalescing into a separate organisation. This prediction is a thread that will be tested and analysed in future episodes as the US political situation develops.
  • The strategy for communists: The call for "systematic, regular, intelligent work" to build a base among youth and workers, while maintaining an independent revolutionary banner, is a standard Leninist prescription. The practical application of this in the current conjuncture is the subject of ongoing internal RCI discussions and educational materials.

Connections

  • Alan Woods, The Meaning of Donald Trump: A Marxist Analysis (2025): The primary text this episode is based on. Essential reading for the full argument.
  • Alan Woods, Bolshevism: The Road to Revolution: Referenced as a foundational text for understanding revolutionary strategy, particularly the need for a disciplined party and a purge of opportunists.
  • Alan Woods, Reason in Revolt: Marxist Philosophy and Modern Science: Referenced as a key text for developing a scientific, materialist worldview.
  • Vladimir Lenin, What is to be Done?: The episode’s closing advice on the primacy of revolutionary theory and the need for patient, systematic work is a direct echo of Lenin’s text.
  • Leon Trotsky, The Struggle Against Fascism in Germany: The classical Marxist analysis of fascism that the episode implicitly draws on to reject the "Trump is a fascist" thesis.
  • Other Against the Stream episodes: The episode references a previous discussion on Reform UK and the "far-right" label. Listeners should seek out that episode for a deeper analysis of the British conjuncture.

Key Quotes

  1. "The task of philosophy is to neither weep nor to laugh but to understand. Now let's set aside all the hysteria and all the noise and din and the propaganda for a moment and try to reflect, try to think with a cool head and answer the question: how does one explain the phenomenon of Donald Trump?"
  2. "Fascism is a very precise thing... a mass movement of the petty bourgeoisie and the lumpen proletariat which is used as a battering ram to smash the working class movement... Now look, Trump was elected in 2016. Is there anything that he did which bears the slightest resemblance to any of these things? Did he illegalise the trade unions? He did not."
  3. "The whole purpose of it [the Ukraine war] was to bring down Putin, create regime change in Moscow which would bring about a pro-western government and the subjugation of Russia to the West. Simple as that. But it didn't turn out like that. All these clever plans have just blown up in their faces."
  4. "The centre ground is collapsed. And there is a polarisation to the right and to the left. That reflects ultimately a class polarisation... The workers are testing the existing parties of leaders one by one. They put them to the test, they found they failed, they discard them, and they look elsewhere."
  5. "The worst mistake they [communists] can make is to give some credence to the idea there's a lesser evil. 'Trump is bad and therefore the other crowd are good.' They are not. They are as much, they are more dangerous to us even than Trump is. Therefore, no question under any circumstance of appearing under the same banner as the so-called Democratic parties, the liberal parties. No way."