Skip to content

Core Argument

Against The Stream · 2025-02-07

The central thesis is that Donald Trump's second term represents a decisive turning point in world politics: the liberal world order — the post-war system of US-led multilateral institutions, free trade ideology, and humanitarian pretexts for imperialist intervention — is collapsing. Trump is not the cause of this collapse but its most aggressive expression. The episode argues that Trump's policies (tariffs, withdrawal from Ukraine, dismantling of USAID, purge of the state apparatus) are the logical conclusion of a longer process of US imperial decline, intensified interimperialist rivalry, and the exhaustion of a particular model of capitalist globalisation.

The claim is that Trump's "honest imperialism" — openly pursuing US national interests without liberal cover — is a response to the objective limits of US power. The US can no longer dominate every theatre simultaneously, so it retrenches to its core sphere (North America, Greenland, Panama Canal) while attempting to split Russia from China and abandon peripheral commitments (Ukraine, NATO's eastern flank). This is not pacifism but a strategic reorientation forced by relative decline.

Theoretical Grounding

The analysis draws on several Marxist concepts:

Organic crisis of capitalism: The episode frames the current conjuncture as a long-term structural crisis — weak booms, deep slumps, declining profitability — that intensifies competition between capitalist powers even among former allies. This is a clear deployment of the Marxist understanding that capitalism's periodic crises become more intractable as the system ages.

Interimperialist rivalry: The argument situates Trump's protectionism within Lenin's framework of imperialist competition for markets, spheres of influence, and raw materials. The key insight is that the post-war period of US-led "free trade" was itself a form of imperialist domination — the US could afford openness because its productivity was supreme. Now that China rivals US production (electric vehicles, AI, artillery shells), the US turns to tariffs, subsidies, and state intervention to protect its base.

The state as instrument of class rule: The episode explicitly rejects liberal notions of an impartial state. The purge of intelligence officials, inspectors general, and Pentagon figures is analysed not as a defence of democracy but as a factional struggle within the ruling class. Trump represents an outsider wing of capital that has declared war on the established state bureaucracy — but both factions serve the same class.

Imperialist retrenchment and the falling mask: The concept that liberal ideology (human rights, democracy, multilateralism) was always a cover for imperialist violence is central. Trump's value, from a Marxist perspective, is that he strips away this mask — openly stating that Greenland matters for national security, that USAID was a regime-change operation, that tariffs are about economic domination. This creates a more transparent terrain for class struggle.

The analysis sits within the Leninist-Luxemburgist tradition of the RCI: anti-reformist, focused on the necessity of revolutionary party-building, and sharply critical of social democrats (Bernie Sanders, Jeremy Corbyn) who prop up capitalist institutions when they should be exposing them.

Conjunctural Relevance

The episode is tightly anchored to specific events from Trump's first weeks in office (early February 2025):

Tariffs: 25% on Mexico and Canada, 10% on China — announced without negotiation, then partially postponed for minor concessions. The episode correctly identifies that the real target is Chinese investment in Mexico bypassing US tariffs, not fentanyl or migration.

Ukraine: Trump's ceasefire push, his envoy's demand for elections, and his statement that the war "should never have been started" represent a dramatic break from Biden's policy. The episode notes Russia now produces 3 million artillery shells annually versus NATO's 1.2 million — a material shift in the balance of forces.

USAID: The dismantling of the $40 billion agency is analysed as the destruction of the CIA's civilian front — funding "independent media," NGOs, and trade union bureaucrats for regime-change operations (Venezuela, Ukraine, Georgia, Cuba). The episode cites Wikileaks cables on the Office of Transition Initiatives in Venezuela.

Purge of the state: 17 inspector generals fired, 50 intelligence officials' security clearances revoked, Mark Milley's security detail removed. This is not anti-corruption but a factional war within the bourgeois state apparatus.

The left's response: Bernie Sanders defending CBS News, USAID, and congressional authority is condemned as propping up thoroughly discredited institutions. The episode positions this as the key failure of reformist social democracy — channelling anti-establishment anger back into defence of capitalist legitimacy.

Where the Argument Continues

The episode deliberately leaves open several threads:

The trajectory of Trumpism: Will working-class support for Trump hold when his policies fail to deliver? The episode suggests disappointment is inevitable, and the task is to build a revolutionary communist force ready for that moment. This is developed in other Against the Stream episodes on the US conjuncture and in the RCI's broader analysis of fascism and Bonapartism.

The Ukraine war's endgame: The episode notes Trump is throwing Ukraine away, but does not predict the precise form of settlement. The Spectre of Communism podcast has covered the Ukraine war in depth, including the material balance of forces and the implications for European capitalism.

The crisis of European social democracy: The German demonstrations against the AfD are mentioned but not developed. The RCI's analysis of the AfD's rise as a symptom of establishment collapse is explored in other episodes on Germany and the European conjuncture.

The split between China and Russia: Trump's strategy of separating Russia from China is noted but not fully analysed. This connects to the RCI's broader work on the shifting geometry of interimperialist rivalry.

Connections

Texts and thinkers: Lenin's Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism is the theoretical backbone — the analysis of interimperialist rivalry, the export of capital, and the division of the world is directly Leninist. The episode also echoes Bukharin's Imperialism and World Economy on the state's role in economic competition.

Other episodes: Against the Stream episodes on the Ukraine war, the crisis of globalisation, and the nature of Trump's first term. The Spectre of Communism podcast's series on the organic crisis of capitalism and the decline of US hegemony.

Broader Marxist texts: The RCI's own theoretical work on the tendency of the rate of profit to fall and the current phase of capitalist crisis. The episode's analysis of protectionism as a response to declining competitiveness echoes Engels's observations on the tariff policies of late 19th-century Germany and the US.

Key Quotes

  1. "Trump derides the ultimate logical conclusion of a process that was already there. Capitalism is in an organic crisis — even though there are still booms and slumps, the booms are very weak and the slumps are much deeper, and there's a long-term downward-facing trend which means that the competition between capitalist powers is increasing even between allies."

  2. "The mask of liberalism, human rights and all that really disgusting mask that was used to justify the imperialist invasion of the United States in Afghanistan — in defence of the rights of Afghan women they said — in reality it was naked US imperialism. But now the mask has fallen. Trump doesn't really care for diplomacy or formalities and he's just exposing the real."

  3. "This is a defeat for the whole liberal world order. The people who ran America since the post-war period and set up that whole order of the capitalist world with all the institutions — the rules-based order and all of these things — the ground is being cut from under them. They're all protesting, kicking and screaming, but there's not much they can do because once the United States decides something, there's very little left for them to do."

  4. "The correct slogan is not 'Down with Trump' — it's 'Down with all of them'. Bernie Sanders calls for a political revolution, just a change of power at the top. We call for a social revolution — take over their wealth, take over the big businesses, the big industries, the media, everything, and run it on the basis of a planned economy controlled by the working class."

  5. "If there was a mass communist organisation — let's say 10,000 people in the US five or ten years ago — you would have had a totally different situation today. But barring that, we need to build that for the next stage. Our forces are way too small at the moment, but that gives us an urgency to build the forces of revolutionary communism in every country."