45. K. Marx. My Plagiarism of F. Bastiat
In a a Bastiatite discovers that I have pinched the definition of the magnitude of value of commodities as being the "socially necessary labour-time" required for their production from F. Bastiat, and in bowdlerised form to boot. I could easily put up with this quid pro quo. For if that Bastiatite No. I finds Bastiat's definition of value and my own to be basically identical, Bastiatite No. II declares almost simultaneously in the Leipzig Literarisches Centralblatt of :" " b
The sum total of Bastiatite No. I added to Bastiatite No. II would be that the whole army of Bastiatites would have forthwith to transfer to my camp and accept wholesale my exposition on capital. One will understand that it is only after much mental strife that I deny myself the pleasure of such an annexation.
The definition of value contained in my work Capital, published in 1867, is to be found two decades earlier in my work attacking Proudhon: Misere de la Philosophie, Paris 1847 (p. 49 seqq.(1)). Bastiat's words of wisdom on value did not see the light of day until some years later.(2) I could not therefore have copied from Bastiat, though Bastiat could well have copied from me.
However, in fact Bastiat gives absolutely no analysis of value. He only dilates upon empty notions as consoling proof that "the world abounds in great and excellent daily services".(3) It is well known that the German Bastiatites are all national liberals.[178] I shall therefore do them also a "great and excellent service" by pointing out the specifically Prussian origin of Bastiat's store of wisdom. Old Schmalz was in fact a councillor to the Prussian government, if I am not mistaken, even a Prussian privy councillor. In addition he was a Demagogue hunter.[179] In 1818 in Berlin this old Schmalz published a Handbuch der Staatswir-thschaftslehre. The French edition of his handbook appeared in 1826 in Paris under the title of Economie politique. The translator, Henri Jouffroy, appeared on the title as "conseiller au service de Prusse".(4) In the following quotation one will find Bastiat's notion of value in its essentials, not only as far as its content is concerned but even as regards its wording:
"Le travail d'autrui en général ne produit jamais pour nous qu'une économie de temps, et [que] cette économie de temps est tout ce qui constitue sa valeur et son prix. Le menuisier, par exemple, qui me fait une table, et le domestique qui me porte mes lettres à la poste, qui me bat mes habits, ou qui cherche pour moi les choses qui me sont nécessaires, me rendent l'un et l'autre un service absolument de même nature; l'un et l'autre m'épargne et le temps que je serais obligé d'employer moi-même à ces occupations, et celui qu'il m'aurait fallu consacrer à acquérir l'aptitude et les talents qu'elles exigent"(5) (Schmalz, I.e., t. I, p. 304).
Now we know where Bastiat learnt his lesson,(6) I nearly said his "Schmalz".
Works, First Russian Edition, Vol. XIII, Part I, Moscow, 1936
Endnotes
[178] The Liberals—members of the party formed by the German, National principally Prussian, bourgeoisie in the autumn of 1866 after a split in the Party of Progress (see Note 46). Its policy showed that a considerable part of the liberal bourgeoisie had abandoned its claims to extend its political prerogatives and had capitulated to Bismarck's Junker government as a result of Prussia's victory in the Austro-Prussian war and the establishment of her supremacy in Germany. Demagogues in Germany were participants in the opposition movement of
[179] intellectuals in the 1820s. The name became current after the Karlsbad Conference of Ministers of the German states in August 1819, which adopted a special decision against the intrigues of "demagogues". Synopsis of Volume One of "Capital" by Marx has survived as an unfinished