Skip to content

Haiti imperialist aggression against Bolivarian Revolution sparks mass movement

Marxist Theory · 2026-05-13

Core Argument

The central thesis is that the mass protests and general strike which paralysed Haiti in February 2019 represent a direct political consequence of the imperialist assault on the Bolivarian Revolution in Venezuela. The article argues that the Haitian ruling class, having stolen nearly $2 billion from the PetroCaribe fund—a programme of Venezuelan solidarity—then compounded its betrayal by siding with US imperialism at the Organisation of American States to declare the Maduro government illegitimate. This act of treachery, coming after years of embezzlement and economic collapse precipitated by the loss of Venezuelan subsidised fuel, broke the bond of popular patience and fused three demands into a single revolutionary movement: the resignation of President Moïse, prosecution of the corrupt elite, and solidarity with Venezuela against US interference. The argument is that the Haitian masses have thereby posed the question of state power directly, and that only a workers' and farmers' government can resolve the crisis.

Theoretical Grounding

The analysis is grounded in the classical Marxist understanding of the relationship between imperialist domination and the revolutionary potential of the oppressed nations. It draws on the Leninist conception of imperialism as a system that deforms and impoverishes peripheral economies, forcing them into dependency on metropolitan powers. The article deploys this framework concretely: Haiti's fuel subsidy could only be maintained through PetroCaribe; once US sanctions severed that lifeline, the IMF moved in to demand privatisation and subsidy removal—a classic pattern of imperialist restructuring through debt and conditionality.

The analysis also sits within the Marxist tradition of internationalism and revolutionary solidarity. The article explicitly links the Haitian and Venezuelan revolutions, invoking the historical debt Chavez acknowledged—that Haiti's 1804 revolution inspired Bolívar and provided him sanctuary. This is not rhetorical flourish but a theoretical claim: that the struggles of the oppressed nations are objectively linked against a common imperialist enemy, and that solidarity is a material force, not merely a sentiment. The argument that the Haitian masses can "come to the aid of the Venezuelan Revolution" by pressing their own struggle forward is a direct application of Trotsky's theory of combined and uneven development—that revolutions in backward countries can leapfrog stages and strike blows against imperialism that resonate globally.

The article's strategic conclusion—that extended strike committees should begin coordinating distribution of food, fuel, and basic services, and that only a government of workers, farmers, and the poor can resolve the crisis—is a clear application of the transitional method and the theory of the united front from below. It rejects any deal brokered by imperialism or the Haitian elite and calls for the independent organisation of the working class to take power.

Conjunctural Relevance

The article was written in February 2019, at a moment of acute geopolitical tension over Venezuela. The US had recognised Juan Guaidó as interim president in January 2019, and the OAS vote on 10 January was part of the diplomatic offensive to isolate Maduro. Haiti's vote alongside the US was therefore not a minor diplomatic gesture but a concrete act of alignment with the imperialist coup attempt.

Economically, the conjuncture was defined by the collapse of Haiti's fuel supply after the effective termination of PetroCaribe in October 2017. The article provides specific data: inflation at 15 percent, electrical output slashed to six hours per day in many areas, fuel tankers sitting in Port-au-Prince harbour because the government could not pay US companies in dollars. The IMF's offer of loans in exchange for subsidy removal and privatisation is identified as the immediate trigger for the July 2018 protests, which then escalated into the February 2019 movement.

The article also notes the fragility of the state's repressive apparatus: the police were reported to be "destabilised" and "unreliable," with "massive contradictions" within their ranks. This is a classic revolutionary conjuncture—a partial paralysis of the state's coercive machinery combined with a mass movement that has shut down the economy for weeks.

Politically, the article names the specific forces: President Jovenel Moïse, the Haitian elite that stole PetroCaribe funds, US imperialism, the IMF, the OAS, and UN troops. It identifies the opposition leadership as calling for continued demonstrations and explicitly rejecting dialogue. The situation is presented as fluid but potentially revolutionary—the government could fall within days or weeks.

Where the Argument Continues

The article leaves several questions open, which would require further analysis as the situation developed:

  • The fate of the Moïse government: The article predicts it could fall, but does not analyse what form a transition might take. Subsequent IDOM articles would need to track whether the movement succeeded in toppling him, whether a deal was brokered by imperialism, or whether the movement was repressed.
  • The role of the strike committees: The article calls for their formation and coordination, but does not analyse whether they actually emerged in practice, what class composition they had, or what political character they assumed.
  • The relationship between the Haitian and Venezuelan movements: The article argues that the Haitian masses can aid the Venezuelan revolution by striking a blow against imperialism at home. This would need to be tested against subsequent events—did the Haitian movement create additional pressure on US imperialism's Venezuelan strategy?
  • The question of the police and military: The article notes the police are "unreliable" but does not analyse the armed forces or the possibility of a split within the state apparatus. This is a critical question for any revolutionary strategy.

The argument continues in the broader IDOM corpus on Venezuela, Haiti, and the Caribbean revolutionary tradition. Readers should consult IDOM articles on the Venezuelan crisis, the role of PetroCaribe, and the history of the Haitian Revolution. The theoretical framework is further developed in Marxist texts on the permanent revolution, the united front, and the national question.

Connections

  • Trotsky, The Permanent Revolution: The article's strategic perspective—that the Haitian working class cannot rely on a bourgeois-democratic solution and must take power itself—is a direct application of the theory of permanent revolution in a peripheral, dependent capitalist state.
  • Lenin, Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism: The analysis of Haiti's dependency on Venezuelan oil, the role of US sanctions, and the IMF's conditional loans is a concrete illustration of Lenin's theory of imperialist exploitation and the division of the world.
  • Marx, The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte: The article's attention to the corruption of the political elite, the theft of state funds, and the separation of the state from the masses echoes Marx's analysis of the Bonapartist state as a parasite on society.
  • IDOM articles on Venezuela: The article is explicitly linked to the broader IDOM analysis of the Bolivarian Revolution, US imperialism's coup attempts, and the need for socialist revolution in Venezuela. These should be read alongside it.
  • IDOM articles on Haiti's revolutionary history: The article references the Haitian Revolution of 1791, the overthrow of Duvalier, and the Aristide period. IDOM's corpus on these subjects provides the historical depth for the contemporary analysis.
  • Against the Stream episodes: The RCI's podcast series has covered the Venezuelan crisis and the Caribbean revolutionary tradition. Episodes from early 2019 would provide further commentary on the conjuncture.

Key Quotes

  1. "There is a direct link and a real bond of solidarity between the Bolivarian Revolution in Venezuela and the developments in the Haitian Revolution. When cancelling Haiti's PetroCaribe debt after the 2010 earthquake, Chavez himself explained that Haiti had no debt with Venezuela, explaining that it was in fact the other way around and Venezuela owed a historic debt to Haiti."

  2. "Not only had the Haitian ruling class flagrantly stolen PetroCaribe funds intended for social development to benefit the poor, now the people were expected to pay for it too?"

  3. "By demanding the resignation of the president, proper investigation of the PetroCaribe theft and punishment for those involved, and by challenging the government's foreign policy in relation to the Bolivarian Revolution, the Haitian people have directly posed the question of who rules in Haitian society."

  4. "With the economy in ruins, the strike committees should begin organising the collection and distribution of basic goods such as food, water and fuel, and organise transportation, education, sanitation and healthcare. Sources of fuel, food and water should be expropriated and distribution organised by the strike committees."

  5. "Only a government of the workers, farmers and poor of Haiti will be able to resolve the current crisis. Only socialism offers a way forward for the people of Haiti."

  6. "By pressing their own revolution forward and striking a decisive blow against imperialism, the Haitian masses can come to the aid of the Venezuelan Revolution. As in past centuries, the Haitian Revolution today could be the spark and source of inspiration for a mighty wave of revolutionary struggle across the whole of the Americas and the world."