Skip to content

Disaster in the Balkans Stop the NATO bombing

Marxist Theory · 2026-05-13

Core Argument

The central thesis is that NATO's bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999 was not a humanitarian intervention but an imperialist military operation that has catastrophically worsened the very conditions it claimed to remedy. The article argues that the bombing accelerated rather than halted ethnic cleansing, strengthened Milosevic's domestic position, destabilised the entire Balkan region, and exposed the cynical hypocrisy of the Western powers. The claim is that imperialism has no interest in the welfare of oppressed peoples — the Kosovar Albanians are "so much small change, to be used and then discarded" — and that the only genuine solution lies in the independent action of the working class across national lines, culminating in a socialist federation of the Balkans.

Theoretical Grounding

The analysis is rooted in the classical Marxist theory of imperialism, drawing directly on Lenin's framework of inter-imperialist rivalry and the subordination of oppressed nations to the strategic interests of the great powers. The article explicitly rejects any notion that NATO acts from humanitarian motives, instead locating the bombing within the broader logic of US imperialism's drive to establish a "New World Order" — a Europe "safe, secure, free, united, a good partner with us for trading" in Clinton's own words.

The treatment of the national question is particularly significant. The article engages directly with Lenin's writings on self-determination, but argues that the right to self-determination is not an absolute — it is "always subordinate to the general interest of the proletariat and the world revolution." In the specific conditions of the Balkans, where populations are thoroughly intermixed and minorities exist within minorities, the demand for national self-determination becomes "a cruel deception" that leads inexorably to ethnic cleansing and war. This places the analysis firmly within the tradition of Trotsky's writings on the Balkans and the national question, which emphasised the necessity of a socialist federation rather than the multiplication of nation-states.

The article also draws on the Marxist understanding of the relationship between Stalinism and nationalism. The break-up of Yugoslavia is traced not to ancient ethnic hatreds but to the collapse of Stalinism and the restoration of capitalism, which "brought all the scum of nationalism and capitalism floating to the surface." The relative stability of the Tito period is attributed to the planned economy and the suppression of national antagonisms through the federal structure — a solution that proved temporary because it was built on Stalinist foundations rather than genuine workers' democracy.

Conjunctural Relevance

The article was written in April 1999, at a moment when the NATO bombing campaign was entering its third week and the situation was rapidly deteriorating. The specific data points are striking: 800,000 displaced persons, half of them in the preceding fortnight; 250,000 refugees in Albania; 120,000 in Macedonia; the shooting down of the first US stealth fighter; the capture of US soldiers; the dispatch of a Russian aircraft carrier to the Adriatic.

The conjuncture is defined by several overlapping crises. First, the immediate humanitarian catastrophe in Kosovo, which the article argues was deliberately intensified by the bombing. Second, the geopolitical escalation between NATO and Russia, with the Russian regime — humiliated by NATO expansion to its borders and the subordination of Yeltsin to IMF conditions — using the crisis to rebuild its military prestige. Third, the destabilisation of neighbouring states: Macedonia's government distancing itself from NATO after mass protests stormed the US embassy; Albania threatened with being dragged into the conflict; Greece and Turkey, both NATO members but historically opposed, taking in refugees and facing internal unrest.

The article identifies the danger of a general Balkan war, with the potential for Albania, Turkey, Greece, and Serbia to be drawn into a wider conflagration. The concept of "Greater Albania" — uniting the 3.2 million Albanians in the Republic with the 750,000 in western Macedonia and the million Kosovar Albanians — is presented as a nationalist time bomb that imperialism's machinations have primed.

Where the Argument Continues

This article is part of a sustained body of Marxist analysis on the Balkans produced by the tradition. The article explicitly references a predecessor document, "The Kosovo Pogrom and the Balkan Powder-keg" by Alan Woods (March 1998), which laid out the theoretical framework for understanding the national question in the Balkans and the necessity of a socialist federation. Readers should consult that text for the fuller elaboration of the position on self-determination.

The argument continues in subsequent IDOM articles covering the evolution of the Kosovo question, the role of the KLA, and the longer-term consequences of NATO's intervention. The broader corpus on imperialism and war — including analyses of the Gulf War, the Iraq invasion, and the Libya intervention — develops the same theoretical framework of inter-imperialist rivalry and the rejection of "humanitarian intervention" as a mask for imperialist interests. The tradition's consistent position on the national question, developed through decades of analysis of the Balkans, Ireland, the Middle East, and other regions, provides the theoretical architecture within which this article sits.

Connections

The article should be read alongside:

  • Lenin, "The Right of Nations to Self-Determination" — the classical text that the article engages with critically, arguing that the right is not absolute but subordinate to the class struggle.
  • Trotsky, "The Balkan Wars" and "The War Correspondence" — Trotsky's journalism from the Balkan Wars of 1912-13 provides the historical precedent for Marxist analysis of the region, including his insistence that the national question could only be resolved through a democratic federation.
  • Alan Woods, "The Kosovo Pogrom and the Balkan Powder-keg" (March 1998) — the direct predecessor to this article, containing the fuller theoretical elaboration of the position on self-determination in the Balkan context.
  • IDOM articles on the break-up of Yugoslavia — the broader analysis of the collapse of Stalinism and the restoration of capitalism as the root cause of the nationalist wars.
  • The tradition's writings on the Gulf War and Iraq — for the parallel analysis of US imperialism's use of bombing campaigns and the exposure of "precision bombing" as propaganda.

Key Quotes

  1. "The imperialist powers have no interest in the Kosovar Albanians. They are so much small change, to be used and then discarded."

  2. "They have achieved in ten days what Milosevic was unable to do in ten years, to empty Kosovo."

  3. "Lenin explained a thousand times that the right of self-determination was not an absolute right, but was always subordinate to the general interest of the proletariat and the world revolution. In the given conditions, so-called self-determination is a recipe for endless wars and ethnic slaughter in the Balkans."

  4. "The break up of Yugoslavia and the collapse of Stalinism brought all the scum of nationalism and capitalism floating to the surface."

  5. "The working class in war as in peace can only rely on their own forces, their own power, their own solidarity and strength."

  6. "Given the mixing up of the population throughout the Balkans, where minorities are part of other minorities, the demand for 'self-determination' is a cruel deception, one that can only lead to ethnic cleansing and war."