Skip to content

World stock market turmoil prepare for a rough ride

Marxist Analysis · 2026-05-13

Core Argument

The article argues that the February 2018 stock market rout is not a temporary correction but a symptom of the underlying, unresolved contradictions of global capitalism. The central claim is that the post-2008 "recovery" was never a genuine resolution of the crisis — it was an artificial boom sustained by cheap money, quantitative easing, and low interest rates. The end of this monetary stimulus, driven by the prospect of rising inflation and interest rates, threatens to puncture the bubble and trigger a new slump. The author insists that the structural problems that caused the 2008 crash — overaccumulation, fictitious capital, and systemic fragility — remain intact, and that the current volatility is a harbinger of a deeper crisis to come, potentially worse than 2008 precisely because the policy ammunition has already been exhausted.

Theoretical Grounding

The analysis draws on the Marxist theory of crisis, particularly the understanding that capitalist "recoveries" are inherently temporary and contradictory. It implicitly invokes the tendency of the rate of profit to fall, though it does not name it directly: the article's emphasis on the exhaustion of the cyclical upswing and the inability of the system to generate sustainable growth points to this underlying dynamic. The piece also deploys the concept of fictitious capital — capital that is not backed by real productive value but by speculative financial instruments — and the related notion that stock markets are not accurate reflections of the real economy. The argument sits firmly within the Marxist tradition that sees financial crises as expressions of deeper contradictions in production, not merely as market failures. The rejection of reformist illusions — that policy tweaks or tax cuts can resolve the crisis — is implicit throughout, and the article's tone reflects the classical Marxist position that capitalism cannot be stabilised, only temporarily patched up.

Conjunctural Relevance

The article is written in the immediate aftermath of the February 2018 stock market sell-off, which saw the Dow Jones Industrial Average fall 1,175 points in a single day — its worst single-day point drop at the time. The author connects this event to several conjunctural factors:

  • The end of quantitative easing and the prospect of monetary tightening by central banks, particularly the US Federal Reserve.
  • The return of inflation fears, which spooked investors accustomed to cheap credit.
  • The US tax cuts of 2017, which the article argues will increase the deficit and government borrowing, further destabilising bond markets.
  • The IMF's upgraded growth forecast for 2018 (3.9%), which the author dismisses as cyclical rather than structural.
  • The specific comparison to spring and summer of 2007, drawn from Financial Times columnist John Authers, who warned that the financial engineering of the current period may be as precarious as the products that collapsed in the credit crisis.

The article situates the stock market turmoil within a broader geopolitical and economic conjuncture: the exhaustion of the post-2008 recovery, the fragility of the global financial system, and the inability of bourgeois policymakers to offer anything more than short-term palliatives.

Where the Argument Continues

This article is an early warning shot in a period of heightened volatility that the RCI has tracked closely. The argument continues in several directions:

  • Later IDOM articles on the 2018–2019 trade war, the inverted yield curve in 2019, and the COVID-19 crash of 2020, which the RCI analysed as the long-predicted new slump.
  • Against the Stream episodes that discuss the limits of monetary policy, the return of inflation, and the geopolitical instability generated by inter-imperialist rivalry.
  • Broader Marxist texts on the tendency of the rate of profit to fall and the theory of crisis, particularly the work of Marx in Capital Volume III and the later contributions of Henryk Grossman and Paul Mattick.

The article does not develop a detailed analysis of the specific financial instruments or transmission mechanisms that might trigger the next crash — it leaves that terrain open for subsequent conjunctural updates.

Connections

  • Marx, Capital Volume III — on the tendency of the rate of profit to fall and the counteracting factors.
  • Henryk Grossman, The Law of Accumulation and Breakdown of the Capitalist System — on the cyclical nature of capitalist crises and the inevitability of breakdown.
  • Paul Mattick, Marx and Keynes — on the limits of state intervention and monetary policy in averting crisis.
  • IDOM articles from 2008–2009 — the RCI's analysis of the Great Recession, which this article explicitly references as an unresolved crisis.
  • John Authers, Financial Times columns from early 2018 — the article quotes Authers directly, making his work a useful bourgeois counterpart for comparison.

Key Quotes

  1. "The problems that led to the 2008 slump were never resolved. This 'recovery', therefore, was always going to lead to a further fall."

  2. "The global economic improvement has not been due to any fundamentals, but for cyclical reasons, which will not last."

  3. "The stock market is never an accurate reflection of the real economy. However, a collapse in stocks can be a harbinger of a new downturn."

  4. "And with all the ammo already used up fighting the last crisis, this new crash could be even worse than 2008."

  5. "The fact that the capitalist system has today reached its limits is clear. Sooner or later the system will enter into another slump, which will once again destroy any hopes of achieving economic or political stability."

  6. "They all fear the coming monetary tightening. That explains the turbulence in the bond markets in the recent period. Rising bond prices can undercut stocks by raising company costs, thus hitting profits. They had become used to the cash cow of cheap money."