Skip to content

The credit crunch one year on

Marxist Analysis · 2026-05-13

Core Argument

The central thesis is that the 2007–2008 credit crunch was not a financial accident, a regulatory failure, or the result of reckless lending alone, but the necessary expression of a deeper crisis in the capitalist mode of production. Michael Roberts distinguishes sharply between the trigger — the collapse of the US sub-prime mortgage market — and the gun — the falling rate of profit in the productive sectors of the advanced capitalist economies. The credit bubble was a compensatory mechanism: as profitability declined after 2005, capital fled into fictitious forms (real estate, securities, derivatives) in a desperate search for returns. The crunch was therefore not a malfunction but the inevitable snapping back of a system that had expanded credit to twelve times world GDP. The article further claims that this recession will be among the most severe since 1980–82, and that a further, even worse crisis will arrive before 2030.

Theoretical Grounding

The analysis is rooted in Marx's law of the tendency of the rate of profit to fall, though Roberts deploys it with restraint. The key conceptual move is the distinction between productive and fictitious capital. The credit bubble is understood as an expansion of fictitious capital — claims on future surplus value that have no basis in actual value creation — which Marx analysed in Volume III of Capital and in his writings on credit and banking. Roberts draws on the Marxist tradition that sees financial crises not as exogenous shocks but as internal to the accumulation process: when the rate of profit in production declines, capital seeks refuge in speculative spheres, inflating bubbles that must eventually burst.

The article also sits within the Marxist critique of Keynesian and mainstream accounts. Roberts implicitly rejects the view that better regulation or monitoring can prevent future crises, since the root cause is not institutional but systemic — the anarchic, competitive nature of production for private profit. This places the analysis in the tradition of Marxist crisis theory associated with figures like Henryk Grossman, Paul Mattick, and more recently, the work of Roberts himself on profitability cycles.

Conjunctural Relevance

Written in August 2008, the article captures the moment when the initial shock of the credit crunch (August 2007) had already produced a cascade of failures — Bear Stearns, Northern Rock, Societe Generale — but before the full explosion of September 2008 (Lehman Brothers, AIG). Roberts correctly identifies that the crisis was not contained within the financial sector: he notes that all G7 economies were already in or near recession, and that the BRICs would soon experience sharp slowdowns. His prediction that China would need growth above 6% to maintain social stability is prescient, given the regime's subsequent reliance on debt-fuelled infrastructure investment.

The article's specific data points — $500bn in bank losses at the time of writing, rising to $1–2trn by IMF estimates; the destruction of 9,000 sub-prime jobs in Orange County alone; the Norwegian municipality of Narvik losing a quarter of its annual budget — ground the analysis in concrete social damage. Roberts also identifies the geographical spread: not just the Anglo-Saxon economies but the Baltic states, Spain, Hungary, and parts of Eastern Europe were already tipping into hard landings.

Where the Argument Continues

This article is an early entry in what became a sustained body of work by Michael Roberts on the 2008 crisis and its aftermath. The argument continues in several directions:

  • On the depth and duration of the crisis: Roberts's later articles on the "Great Recession" and the subsequent "Long Depression" (2010–2014) develop the claim that the recovery would be weak and that a second downturn was inevitable before 2020.
  • On profitability data: Roberts has since published extensive empirical work on the rate of profit in the US, UK, Japan, and the Eurozone, refining the claim that profitability began to fall after 2005. His book The Great Recession: A Marxist View (2009) and later The Long Depression (2016) provide the full data.
  • On the political consequences: The article does not discuss the political fallout — the rise of austerity, the weakening of social democracy, the emergence of left-populist and far-right alternatives. These are taken up in later IDOM articles and Against the Stream episodes.
  • On the COVID-19 crisis: Roberts's analysis of the 2020 crash explicitly compares it to 2008, arguing that the pandemic merely accelerated a crisis already latent in the system.

Connections

  • Marx, Capital, Volume III, especially the chapters on credit and fictitious capital and the law of the tendency of the rate of profit to fall.
  • Henryk Grossman, The Law of Accumulation and Breakdown of the Capitalist System — the classic Marxist text on crisis as a necessary outcome of falling profitability.
  • Michael Roberts, The Great Recession: A Marxist View (2009)* and The Long Depression (2016)* — the book-length development of the argument.
  • Andrew Kliman, The Failure of Capitalist Production (2012) — a complementary empirical study of the US rate of profit and the crisis, though with a different emphasis on the temporal dynamics of value.
  • IDOM articles by Roberts on the 2020 crash and the COVID-19 recession, which explicitly reference the predictions made in this 2008 piece.
  • Against the Stream episodes — several episodes from 2018–2020 revisit the 2008 crisis in light of the subsequent decade of stagnation.

Key Quotes

  1. "The trigger (but not the gun) was the collapse of the US housing market and the debacle of the so-called sub-prime mortgage market."

  2. "The gun was the anarchic and crisis-ridden nature of the capitalist system of production. The bullet was declining profitability."

  3. "The global credit market (including loans, bonds and derivatives) expanded from three times world GDP to 12 times in just ten years. So this credit bubble (the expansion of fictitious capital, as Marx called it) is different because it was huge and it was global."

  4. "As the credit boom exploded, profitability of the productive sectors began to decline, particularly after 2005 (according to my figures). The credit bubble expanded even more in response. But just like a yo yo, credit growth reached its limit and has now jumped back with a vengeance."

  5. "Sure, now all the talk in the councils of government and high finance is that they have learnt the lessons of the crunch and they will 'regulate' and 'monitor' to ensure that it does not happen again. It won't – in the same way. But as sure as the night is black, if capitalism continues as the system of the human organization, there will be more crunches and economic crises."

  6. "This recession won't be the last before 2020. There will be another, perhaps even worse, before the next decade is out."