Skip to content

Economic slowdown the ruling class fears revolution

Marxist Analysis · 2026-05-13

Core Argument

The central thesis is that the world capitalist system is entering a new, more dangerous phase of its organic crisis — not merely another cyclical downturn, but a structural impasse from which the usual escape routes have been exhausted. The article argues that the ruling class knows this, and that its mood of desperation at Davos reflects a genuine fear that the next recession will trigger uncontrollable social and political convulsions. The claim is not simply that capitalism is in crisis, but that it has lost the capacity to develop the productive forces, that the debt-fuelled "recovery" since 2008 was an illusion, and that the political instruments — low interest rates, quantitative easing, fiscal stimulus — are now spent. The bourgeoisie, having delayed the day of reckoning with cheap credit, now faces a crisis it cannot manage.

Theoretical Grounding

The analysis is grounded in the Marxist theory of crisis, particularly the understanding that capitalism's historic justification is its ability to develop the productive forces through accumulation. The article draws on Ted Grant's work from the 1950s — specifically his pamphlet Will there be a slump? — to argue that the falling rate of investment and declining productivity growth are not conjunctural problems but symptoms of a deeper exhaustion. The concept of overaccumulation is implicit throughout: capital has been piled up without productive outlets, diverted instead into speculation and fictitious capital (art, housing, stock buybacks). The critique of Keynesian and monetary policy interventions follows the classical Marxist position that central banks cannot override the laws of motion of capital — they can delay crises but not prevent them. The article also deploys Lenin's theory of imperialism, particularly the analysis of inter-imperialist rivalry, to explain the turn to protectionism and the creation of state-backed "national champions." The theoretical tradition is that of Trotskyist orthodoxy: capitalism has outlived its historical role, and the task is to prepare the working class for the revolutionary alternative.

Conjunctural Relevance

The article was written in May 2019, at a moment when the world economy was showing clear signs of deceleration after a brief, tax-cut-fuelled uptick in the US. The specific conjunctural features are:

  • The inverted yield curve had appeared multiple times in preceding months, historically a reliable recession signal.
  • The IMF had downgraded global growth forecasts from 3.7% to 3.3%, and the Brookings-FT TIGER index predicted a "synchronised slowdown."
  • Productivity growth in the OECD had fallen to 8.7% over 2007-2017, compared to over 25% in the early 1970s.
  • Total global debt had reached 317% of world GDP according to the Institute of International Finance, with Chinese debt exploding from 130% to 250% of GDP since 2008.
  • The US-China trade war was escalating, with Trump threatening 25% tariffs and both powers positioning for control of 5G technology.
  • European economies were stagnating: Italy in recession, Germany narrowly avoiding one, the Eurozone growing at 0.1-0.2% per quarter.
  • Political instability was mounting: the Yellow Vest movement in France, Brexit paralysis, the rise of Bolsonaro in Brazil, and the growing independence of bourgeois politicians from bourgeois control.

The article identifies the key forces: Trump, Macron, the ECB, the Federal Reserve, the Chinese Communist Party, and the European Commission. It names specific corporations (Apple, Foxconn, Boeing, Airbus, Huawei, ZTE, Alstom, Siemens) and specific individuals (Jamie Dimon, Ray Dalio, Kenneth Rogoff, Martin Wolf) to ground the analysis in concrete agents and events.

Where the Argument Continues

The article leaves several questions open that are developed elsewhere in the IDOM corpus:

  • The nature of the coming recession: The article predicts a deeper crisis than 2008-9 but does not specify its likely trigger or form. Later IDOM articles on the COVID-19 economic crash and the 2022 inflation surge develop this.
  • The political response of the working class: The article notes that "workers and the poor have a tendency to get angry" but does not analyse the actual state of working-class organisation, consciousness, or the prospects for revolutionary leadership. This is taken up in articles on strikes, the Yellow Vests, and the Chilean uprising.
  • The dynamics of inter-imperialist rivalry: The article sketches the US-China trade war and European protectionism but does not develop a full analysis of the geopolitical realignment. Later pieces on Ukraine, Taiwan, and the "decoupling" of supply chains extend this.
  • The question of reformism: The article notes that the bourgeoisie might make "temporary concessions" but does not engage with the strategy of the labour movement. This is addressed in IDOM articles on Corbyn, Sanders, and the reformist left.

The argument continues in Ted Grant's Will there be a slump? (referenced in the text), in the IDOM series on the law of the tendency of the rate of profit to fall, and in the Against the Stream episodes on the world economic outlook.

Connections

  • Ted Grant, Will there be a slump? — The theoretical foundation for the analysis of investment and crisis.
  • Lenin, Imperialism: the Highest Stage of Capitalism — The framework for understanding inter-imperialist rivalry and monopoly capitalism.
  • Marx, Capital Volume III — The law of the tendency of the rate of profit to fall, which underlies the argument about declining investment.
  • IDOM, "The Tendency of the Rate of Profit to Fall" series — Develops the theoretical mechanism the article invokes but does not fully explain.
  • IDOM, "The Chinese Economy: Bubble or Boom?" — Extends the analysis of Chinese debt and the limits of state-directed accumulation.
  • IDOM, "The Yellow Vest Revolt" — Connects the economic crisis to the political anger the article identifies.
  • Michael Roberts, The Long Depression — A contemporary Marxist account of the post-2008 period that complements the article's empirical claims.

Key Quotes

  1. "The reality is that the capitalist system is facing not a minor blip, not a short recession, but a major organic crisis. The fact is that capitalism has outlived its historic role. It can no longer develop the productive forces the way that it did in the past and has been living for decades on borrowed time."

  2. "In the end, the only historic justification for capitalism is its ability to invest to develop the productive forces, but this is no longer taking place. In these conditions, the enormous growth in inequality serves only to increase the pile of money accumulated at one end of society, without any significant increase in investments."

  3. "For a whole historic period, the bourgeoisie attempted to avoid crisis with cheap credit, but that strategy created huge debt and only delayed the inevitable."

  4. "The problem with debt, of course, is that eventually it has to be paid back, and not just paid back, but with interest. The interest compounds the problem. Unless whoever is borrowing the money is constantly adding more debt, their consumption power will eventually be cut because of the interest payments."

  5. "What is being proposed is basically the creation of massive European monopolies to take on particularly the Chinese but also other monopolies. In a sense, it's a further development of what Lenin described in Imperialism: the Highest Stage of Capitalism, when each nation state had a few monopolies in each industry."

  6. "The next recession will be much deeper and harsher than that of 2008-9. The crisis is thus not over at all. It is about to enter an even more serious phase, with all the consequences that entails for social instability and class struggle."