Skip to content

Credit crunch

Marxist Analysis · 2026-05-13

Core Argument

The central thesis is that the 2007 credit crunch is not a temporary liquidity problem or a regulatory failure, but the necessary expression of a deeper crisis in capitalist profitability. Michael Roberts argues that the housing bubble and the explosion of fictitious capital were deliberate attempts by capital to offset the falling rate of profit in the productive sector after 1997. The credit crunch is therefore the moment when the contradiction between fictitious capital and real accumulation becomes impossible to sustain. The article claims that this synchronised downturn in profitability, credit, stock markets and property prices heralds a major global slump by 2009-10, potentially as severe as 1929-33.

Theoretical Grounding

The analysis is rooted in Marx's law of the tendency of the rate of profit to fall (LTRPF), which Roberts uses as the organising framework. The argument draws a direct causal line from the decline in productive profitability after 1997 to the turn toward unproductive sectors—finance and property—as a means of maintaining economic momentum. Roberts deploys Marx's concept of fictitious capital to describe the explosion of credit, derivatives and asset prices that grew far beyond the value created by productive labour. The distinction between productive and unproductive labour is also central: the financial sector is treated as unproductive because it does not create new value, only redistributes it. The article situates itself within the Marxist tradition that sees financial crises not as accidents or external shocks but as immanent expressions of the contradictions of capital accumulation, following the work of Marx in Volume III of Capital and later theorists of crisis such as Henryk Grossmann.

Conjunctural Relevance

The article was written in November 2007, at the moment when the sub-prime mortgage crisis was breaking but before the full collapse of Lehman Brothers in September 2008. Roberts identifies the US housing market as the epicentre, tracing the mechanics of sub-prime lending, securitisation and the global distribution of mortgage-backed assets. He provides specific data: $60bn in bank write-offs already announced, OECD estimates of $300bn in final losses, and a global derivatives market valued at $550trn—eleven times world annual output. The article connects the crisis to concrete events: the sacking of the heads of Citibank and Merrill Lynch, the collapse of Northern Rock in the UK, and the losses suffered by Norwegian municipal pension funds in Narvik. Roberts argues that the credit crunch is global and synchronised, with falling profitability, contracting credit, declining stock markets and dropping property prices all pointing in the same direction. He predicts a major slump by 2009-10, which subsequent events confirmed.

Where the Argument Continues

This article is an early statement of what became a sustained analysis of the 2008 financial crisis and its aftermath within the Marxist tradition represented by In Defence of Marxism. The argument is developed in two companion pieces by Alan Woods: "A financial September 11" (Parts One and Two), which draw out the political lessons of the banking crisis. Roberts himself continued the analysis in subsequent articles tracking the trajectory of the crisis, the profitability of the US economy, and the long-term implications for capitalist accumulation. The broader theoretical framework is elaborated in Roberts' later book The Great Recession: A Marxist View and in the ongoing work of the World Crisis Research Network. The article also connects to the Marxist tradition's analysis of financialisation, particularly the work of Andrew Kliman and the debate over the LTRPF.

Connections

  • Alan Woods, "A financial September 11" (Parts One and Two) – draws political and strategic lessons from the same crisis
  • Michael Roberts, "Britain: The rocky road to ruin" (September 2007) – earlier article on the UK dimension
  • Marx, Capital Volume III – the theoretical foundation for the law of the tendency of the rate of profit to fall and the concept of fictitious capital
  • Henryk Grossmann, The Law of Accumulation and Breakdown of the Capitalist System – the classical Marxist crisis theory that informs Roberts' approach
  • Andrew Kliman, The Failure of Capitalist Production – a contemporary restatement of the LTRPF as the key to understanding the 2008 crisis
  • Michael Roberts, The Great Recession: A Marxist View – the book-length development of the analysis begun in this article

Key Quotes

  1. "Both the savings and loans disaster in 1980s and the sub-prime crisis now are examples of how a corrupt and greedy capitalism tries to maintain economic momentum by turning to unproductive sectors because the productive sectors have weakened."

  2. "In the US, the rate of profit earned by all sectors of capitalist investment peaked in 1997... This rising proportion (that Marx called the organic composition of capital) begins to drive the rate of profit down just as the mass or overall total of profit rises."

  3. "Credit is money supply (printing banknotes and increasing bank reserves), debt (issuance of bonds and loans) and stock market values (increased prices for buying and selling shares in companies). When this expanded way beyond the accumulation of real capital, it was fictitious."

  4. "In the first seven years of the decade of 2000, fictitious capital grew at over 25% a year compared to the growth of real production in the capitalist world (up a maximum of 5-7% a year)."

  5. "As we have shown in this column before, it has been a feature of modern capitalism in its declining phase for capital to be invested more in unproductive rather than productive sectors."

  6. "This synchronised downturn in profitability, credit, stock and property prices heralds a major economic slump by 2009-10, or even earlier. The credit crunch will lead to the worst global failure of capitalist production since 1980-2 and perhaps even as bad as 1929-33."