Skip to content

Capitalist recession and Iraq

Marxist Analysis · 2026-05-13

Core Argument

The article argues that the US-led invasion of Iraq cannot and will not resolve the underlying crisis of profitability that caused the 2001 recession. On the contrary, the war represents a desperate political gamble by the Bush administration to manage the domestic fallout of economic stagnation, while the real drivers of the downturn — falling profit rates, overaccumulation, and the exhaustion of the 1990s stock market bubble — remain untouched. The central claim is that military Keynesianism and imperial plunder are structurally incapable of restoring capitalist profitability; at best they offer a temporary confidence boost, at worst they tip the world economy into a depression.

Theoretical Grounding

The analysis is grounded in the Marxist theory of crisis, specifically the tendency of the rate of profit to fall as the driving mechanism behind the 2001 downturn. Roberts explicitly rejects explanations that treat the recession as a consequence of exogenous shocks (9/11, corporate fraud) or policy errors, instead locating its cause in the internal contradictions of capital accumulation. The article draws on Marx's account of how competition compels overinvestment, leading to excess capacity and falling profitability, and distinguishes between profits realised in circulation (financial speculation, asset inflation) and profits generated in production. This distinction — between fictitious capital and productive accumulation — is central to the argument that the 1990s boom was built on unsustainable foundations. The piece also implicitly engages with the Marxist tradition on imperialism, treating the Iraq war not as a rational response to economic crisis but as a political diversion that cannot resolve the system's contradictions.

Conjunctural Relevance

The article was written in July 2002, roughly a year after the 2001 recession officially ended and nine months before the invasion of Iraq. At the time of writing, the US economy was experiencing a "jobless recovery": GDP growth had resumed but business investment remained flat, manufacturing employment continued to fall, and corporate profits had only recovered 1.4% from their 2001 trough. Roberts cites data on falling business-sector prices (deflation in the productive economy), record mortgage delinquencies, declining house prices, and the collapse of European stock markets to 1997 levels. The conjuncture is defined by the gap between financial market optimism (pricing in a quick Iraq victory) and the material reality of overaccumulation and debt. The article names specific figures — Greenspan, Moskow, Roach, Richebacher — and specific corporate scandals (Enron, WorldCom, Vivendi) as symptoms of the same underlying profitability crisis. The geopolitical dimension is treated as a secondary effect: the war is a response to economic weakness, not a solution to it.

Where the Argument Continues

This article is an early statement of a thesis Roberts develops systematically in his later work, particularly The Great Recession (2009) and The Long Depression (2016). The argument that the 2001 recession was not a normal cyclical downturn but the beginning of a prolonged period of stagnation — a "long depression" — is elaborated across multiple IDOM articles from the mid-2000s. The relationship between imperialist war and capitalist crisis is taken up in later pieces on Afghanistan, Libya, and Ukraine, where the same pattern recurs: military intervention as a political response to economic weakness that fails to resolve the underlying contradictions. The article also anticipates the 2008 financial crisis, which Roberts later analyses as the explosive manifestation of the same profit-rate dynamics described here. Readers should consult the IDOM archive for subsequent articles on the US housing bubble, the 2008 crash, and the post-2009 recovery to see how this analysis develops.

Connections

  • Marx, Capital Volume 3 — the law of the tendency of the rate of profit to fall and the theory of crisis.
  • Roberts, The Great Recession (2009) — the full elaboration of the profit-rate analysis of the 2001-2008 cycle.
  • Roberts, The Long Depression (2016) — the argument that the post-2008 period is a structural depression, not a normal cycle.
  • IDOM articles on the 2008 crash — the same theoretical framework applied to the housing bubble and financial crisis.
  • Against the Stream episodes on imperialism — the political economy of US military intervention in the 21st century.
  • The Marxist tradition on war and crisis — Lenin's Imperialism and Bukharin's Imperialism and World Economy provide the classical framework, though Roberts is more focused on the economic limits of imperialist policy than on its geopolitical logic.

Key Quotes

  1. "The key to judging whether world capitalism is going to stay in an economic recession that destroys investment and jobs and lowers the living standards of the majority is the prospect for profit. Capitalism is a system where producers (privately-owned companies) invest, employ and produce only if it is profitable."

  2. "Since 1997, each extra piece of investment in equipment and labour has been producing less profit. By 2001, absolute profits in the productive areas of the US economy fell sharply. Sure, profits were still made in selling consumer goods and services. But there was no profit in making anything."

  3. "In the stock market boom of the 1990s, capitalist corporations made their profits not so much from making things or even providing services, but more from investing in other companies and hoping their share prices rise. Of course, this is impossible indefinitely."

  4. "The best scenario for Bush and world capitalism would be a quick victory in Iraq, with US troops in place with relatively small casualties and new regime backing the US. World stock markets are still pricing in this 'good scenario'. But even if this were to happen, it would do little to turn the world economy round. It might briefly improve 'confidence' but it won't get businesses out of debt and it won't create jobs."

  5. "Bush's Iraqi adventure is no way out for world capitalism at best, and it could be the tipping point for a world economic depression at worst."