- Productivity growth, as seen in 1996
- The link between crude oil prices and airfares
- Unemployment and marriage status
- US manufacturing employment is down, but each state has its own story
- Real GDP growth by state: First quarter 2026
- Productivity growth, as seen in 1996
- The link between crude oil prices and airfares
- Unemployment and marriage status
- US manufacturing employment is down, but each state has its own story
- Real GDP growth by state: First quarter 2026
- July 2026
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
Productivity growth, as seen in 1996¶
The recent AI boom has renewed debate about how official statistics capture changes in productivity growth and how any lags or limitationsmight impact monetary policy. For example, in the 1990s, some believed that low measures of productivity weren’t capturing the true benefits from new technology.
Back in 1996
Federal Reserve Chair Alan Greenspan argued in 1996 that the productivity gains associated with the information and communications technology boom were not yet visible in the official data. That judgment helped supporthis case for delaying preemptive interest-rate increases.
Shortly afterward, the 1999 comprehensive revision of the National Income and Product Accounts began treating software expenditures as capital investment. Together with other statistical changes, this revision raised estimates of the productivity growth that had occurred during the 1990s, bringing the official data closer in line with the acceleration in productivity that Greenspan believed had been under way.
The data, as seen in 1996, 2000, and 2026
Our ALFRED graph above compares three vintages of labor productivity growth data: The blue bars reflect early data available in September 1996. The green bars reflect the revised data available in February 2000, which incorporate the 1999 NIPA revision. The orange bars reflect the most-current data available at the time of this writing, as of June 2026.
- As of September 1996, the data indicated that labor productivity had grown by an average of just 0.89% between 1989 and 1995.
- By February 2000, average labor productivity growth for that same time period had been raised to 1.40%.
- As of June 2026, after more revisions, it stands at 1.51%. This comparison shows how weak measures of productivity growth appeared in real time and how subsequent revisions substantially altered the historical picture.
How this graph was created: SearchALFREDfor “Nonfarm Business Sector: Labor Productivity (Output per Hour) for All Workers” and select the series with ID OPHNFB. Open “Edit Graph” and add the series three times. Set the as-of dates to September 10, 1996; February 8, 2000; and June 4, 2026. For each series, change the units to “Percent Change from Year Ago,” set the frequency to “Annual,” and use “Average” as the aggregation method. Adjust the observation period to begin in 1989 and end in 1995.
Suggested byHannah Rubinton.